Sustainability indicators of the City of Prague
Information from the yearbook Prague Environment 2005
(the text below is based on the chapter Sustainability indicators of the City of Prague published in yearbook Prague Environment 2005)
Sustainability indicators make the evaluation of progress towards sustainable development easier, enable to make benchmarking to recommended values and legal limits, and to compare states, regions, and cities with each other; enable to set the development objectives, and to evaluate effectiveness of resources spent. The indicators are based on principles of sustainable development, which encompass not merely environmental protection but also reinforcement of local self-government, deepening of democracy, equality, and social justice, supplies to local demands at the local level, protection of cultural heritage, harmonisation of economic development and exploitation of natural resources, etc. Many global and European initiatives (ICLEI, WHO, REC, for example) work on the creation of suitable sets of indicators and their implementation not only at national and regional levels yet also at the local levels, they also form parts of research programmes of the European Union.
The City of Prague and Sustainability indicators
In 1998 Prague got involved in the Project “Cities Environment Report on Internet – CEROI”. Within the framework of the United Nations Environmental Program (UNEP) who supports the Project a set of indicators for the urban level was developed as well. A part of these indicators (30) was marked as crucial indicators so-called core set. Indicators appropriate to Prague were compiled and are presented here, of which mostly environmental indicators were selected. The indicator selection also reflects environmental priorities of the Strategic Plan of the City of Prague. A portion of the indicators used were also a part the set of so-called European Common Indicators1).
In 2004 and within the study of “Evaluation of the Yearbook Prague – Environment and Proposal for Further Development” works on the updating of the existing set of indicators following to so far acquired experience with the set application, the ECI set of indicators applied in European cities and experience from the project TIMUR2) and namely sets of indicators were formed within the new conceptual documents of the City of Prague (RC EEA, WMP of the City of Prague, TES of the City of Prague, and others)3). The main outcome of the project was the proposal of new set of crucial sustainable environmental indicators of the City of Prague. The set of indicators here below is based on the set presented in recent years, for the sake of continuity of time series, yet it was supplemented with several new indicators and at the same time some of the indicators were modified.
The overview gives indicators, which express environmental stress (exploitation of natural resources, emissions etc.), indicators referring to the status of the environment, furthermore indicators of the influence and impacts of the status of the environment namely on human health, and indicators of social response to the status of the environment
Note:
1) The project of “Towards local sustainable profile – European Common Indicators” is a result of the cooperation of the European Commission (General Directorate for the Environment), European Environmental Agency, and the Expert Group for Urban Environment and was formed on the basis of consultancies with numerous European municipalities. The indicators are closely related to priorities of the Sub-Programme of the Sixth Action Programme for the Environment in Europe “Thematic Strategy for Urban Environment”. Thus the system of indicators represents an instrument for the decision-making and for dissemination of information on best available techniques for sustainable development at local level.
2) Introduction of local indicators in the Czech cities and municipalities has been supported by the Team Initiative for Local Sustainable Development (Timur). Timur is an association of non-government, non-profit organisations and individuals and its core activity is just the monitoring of sustainability indicators, quality of life and environmental quality at local level.
3) Complete sets of indicators proposed within the framework of aforementioned conceptual documents can be found at the Internet pages of the City of Prague.
Tab. - Sustainability Indicators of the City of Prague
Indicator Name | Unit | Value Year 2000 |
Value Year 2001 |
Value Year 2002 |
Value Year 2003 |
Value Year 2004 |
Source | Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Annual consumption of fuel and energy per inhabitant after the conversion |
GJ/capita/year |
. |
50,4 |
. |
. |
. |
OIM MHMP |
Energy consumption after the conversion gives objective need for heat and energy at the inlet to premises (or technologies). Year 1996: 54.3, year 1998: 50.9. |
Annual electricity consumption per capita |
kWh/capita/year |
1 021,8 |
1 137,6 |
1 136,8 |
1 171,3 |
1 192,7 |
PRE, ČSÚ |
In 2004 share of renewable energy sources accounted for 1.0 %.1) |
Annual vehicle-kilometrest ravelled per capita |
thousand vehicle-km/capita/year |
4,64 |
4,85 |
5,04 |
5,34 |
5,58 |
ÚDI, |
|
Total number of vehicles per capita |
number/capita |
0,63 |
0,65 |
0,67 |
0,672) |
0,632) |
ÚDI |
|
Air emissions NOx |
tonnes/capita/year |
0,015 |
0,019 |
0,018 |
0,019 |
0,020 |
ČHMÚ, ATEM, |
3) |
Air emissions SO2 |
tonnes/capita/year |
0,0029 |
0,0030 |
0,0022 |
0,0022 |
0,0023 |
ČHMÚ, ATEM, |
|
Quality of local air – Number of exceedances of PM10 limit value |
number |
. |
. |
85 |
140 |
135 |
ČHMÚ |
European common indicator A5 |
Average household water consumption |
l/day/capita |
143,3 |
137,9 |
134,7 |
136,6 |
130,8 |
PVK, ČSÚ, |
CEROI Core set |
Waste production per capita |
tonnes/capita/year |
2,7 |
2,2 |
3,2 |
2,9 |
3,15 |
VÚV TGM, |
CEROI Core set |
of which: |
0,426 |
0,402 |
0,483 |
0,488 |
0,504 |
|||
– hazardous waste |
0,272 |
0,225 |
0,309 |
0,181 |
0,105 |
|||
– household waste |
0,21 |
0,22 |
0,24 |
0,25 |
0,26 |
|||
Percentage of waste disposed by landfilling |
% |
11,5 |
10,3 |
18,5 |
11,0 |
7,6 |
VÚV TGM, |
Indicator of the WMP of the City of Prague6) – Basic indicator I.8 (values of waste in total) |
Percentage of waste disposed by incineration |
% |
5,4 |
9,0 |
5,6 |
6,5 |
5,9 |
VÚV TGM, |
Indicator of the WMP of the City of Prague6) – Basic indicator I.10 (values of waste in total) |
Percentage of reused waste |
% |
12,8 |
8,7 |
22,1 |
29,5 |
38,8 |
VÚV TGM, |
Indicator of the WMP of the City of Prague6) – Basic indicator I.5 (values of waste in total) |
Noise – percentage of population exposed to noise |
% |
. |
23 |
. |
European common indicator B8 |
|||
Water quality of surface watercourses |
BOD (mg O2/l) |
3,41 |
1,74 |
2,14 |
2,53 |
2,21 |
ČHMÚ |
Hydrometric profile at the Vltava River Podolí |
P total (µg/l) |
0,2 |
0,18 |
0,15 |
0,14 |
0,13 |
|||
N as NO3 (mg/l) |
3,01 |
3,17 |
3,68 |
2,86 |
3,1 |
|||
The number of respiratory diseases hospital admissions per 1,000 inhabitants |
Number per |
14,7 |
14,8 |
15,3 |
16,2 |
15,4 |
ÚZIS |
|
Percentage of inhabitants connected to the public sewage system |
% |
99,3 |
99,4 |
99,2 |
99,6 |
99,5 |
ČSÚ |
CEROI Core set |
Percentage of waste water treated |
% |
100 |
100 |
4) |
100 |
100 |
ČSÚ |
CEROI Core set |
Waste water treatment – percentage of pollution removed as BOD |
% |
93,7 |
93 |
4) |
96 |
97,3 |
PVK, ČOV, |
|
Life expectancy at birth |
years |
73,29 |
73,58 |
73,71 |
73,68 |
74,1 |
ČSÚ |
|
79,03 |
79,03 |
78,94 |
79,15 |
79,6 |
||||
Area of protected areas as percentage of the City total area |
% |
4,3 |
4,3 |
4,3 |
4,3 |
4,3 |
MHMP, ÚRM, IMIP |
European common indicator B9 |
– nature parks |
19,7 |
19,7 |
19,7 |
19,7 |
19,7 |
|||
Length of marked bicycle paths and cycling routes |
km |
. |
. |
. |
. |
89,5 |
Working group for bicycle transport in Prague |
Objective set: 450 km of cycling routes |
– cycling routes |
. |
. |
. |
. |
165 |
1) The data are calculated from electricity consumption in households in the City of Prague and in Roztoky near Prague (PRE, a. s.; the value includes seasonal and migration effects) and the sum of inhabitants in the City of Prague and in Roztoky near Prague (CSO; mean value).
2) Data on the number of registered motor vehicles in 2003 have the error in the registry up to 130,000 vehicles, data for 2004 also have an error yet not specified above.
3) Since 2001 mobile source emissions have been calculated by means of a new methodology. The application of the new methodology in 2002 on small stationary sources, using the data of Census 2001, caused a relatively significant annual decrease in small source emission.
4) The value is not given due to the floods in August 2002.
5) Here sections marked by the vertical traffic signs type C8, C9, and C10 and sections running on local or purpose communications without any automotive traffic are registered as paths. There are no comparable data for previous years.
6) Waste Management Plan of the City of Prague.
(In the column “Note“ there are selected basic objectives given only, their exhaustive list is given in the Binding Part of the WMP pf the City of Prague.)
Information sources:
Regional Environmental Centre for Central and Eastern Europe
www.reccr.cz/projektys/indikator/indikator.html
Team Initiative for Local Sustainable Development (Timur)
www.timur.cz
CEROI – Cities environment reports on the Internet
www.ceroi.net
Indicators for the Cities21 pilot project
www.cities21.com/cities21/index.htm
European Environment Agency
www.eea.eu.int